Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1117/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1117A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to cure procedural defects in the claim.

Case Number AUTO 1117/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to unresolved procedural defects in the petition. The applicants challenged a social security denial and labor court judgment, alleging violations of equality and due process rights. The court rejected the claim because the applicants failed to correct the formal deficiencies required for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the petition contains uncorrected procedural defects that prevent its examination.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural defects inadmissibility social security benefits labor court judgment constitutional appeal failure to cure due process rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 238-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 238/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación.

Don José María Carrobles Jiménez y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra resolución del INSS, denegatoria del complemento de jornada de mañana y tarde, y contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 9 de Madrid, desestimatoria, y Auto que tuvo

por desistido el recurso de suplicación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01117-1988_00238.pdf