Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1108/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1108A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection and equality in civil procedure.

Case Number AUTO 1108/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Julio Macarrón Echarren against a Supreme Court ruling that rejected a civil appeal. The applicants argued this violated their rights to equality and effective judicial protection under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The court rejected these claims because the lower courts had already provided a complete and effective judicial remedy, rendering the constitutional appeal unnecessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible when the ordinary judicial system has already offered an effective remedy, and the principle of equality is not violated by the procedural history.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection principle of equality constitutional appeal inadmissibility civil procedure appeal ordinary courts remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1783-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.783/1987

Resumen

Inadmision. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso de casación. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Julio Macarrón Echarren y otra interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Sevilla, en autos sobre

reclamación dimanante del art. 1.604 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución impugnada.

containers

Visualización

containers