Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 14 and 24.1 CE.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Juan Manuel Baltanás García against labor court resolutions dismissing his invalidity claim. The applicant formally invoked Articles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution but failed to substantiate the constitutional content of his demand. The court ruled that without a clear demonstration of how the specific constitutional rights were violated, the appeal lacks the necessary procedural foundation for examination.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution; The Constitutional Court requires a precise and formal invocation of the specific constitutional rights alleged to be violated, coupled with a clear demonstration of their substantive infringement, to admit an appeal for protection.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 454-1988
Fecha de resolución
06/10/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 454/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Juan Manuel Baltanás García interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Magistratura de Trabajo de La Rioja que, en autos sobre invalidez, acuerda el archivo de las actuaciones por no cumplimentarse requerimiento. Invoca la vulneración de
los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01100-1988_00454.pdf