Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1098/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1098A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for fraud conviction, ruling non bis in idem applies to real crime concurrence.

Case Number AUTO 1098/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by José Avila Rojas and others against their fraud convictions. The applicants argued violations of Articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution, claiming a breach of the non bis in idem principle due to the concurrence of crimes. The Court rejected this, holding that the principle applies to real concurrence of crimes and that the constitutional content of the demand was lacking.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 25 C.E.: The principle of non bis in idem applies to real concurrence of crimes, not formal procedural multiplicity, and the constitutional content of an appeal must substantively demonstrate the specific violation alleged.

Keywords

AI generated
non bis in idem concurrence of crimes fraud conviction constitutional appeal procedural multiplicity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
consagrados en los arts. 24 y 25 C.E.
Art. 25 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 444-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 444/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no falta. Principio non bis in idem: concurso real de delitos. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Avila Rojas y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 de Granada, condenatoria por delito de estafa, y de la Audiencia Provincial confirmatoria en apelación. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en los arts. 24 y 25 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01098-1988_00444.pdf