Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1087/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1087A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 17 and 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 1087/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Martí Lloret against his conviction for robbery. Although the applicant invoked violations of Articles 17 and 24.1 of the Constitution, the Court found no formal invocation of the specific right to defense. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the necessary procedural requirement to exhaust administrative remedies or formally invoke the right was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 17 CE: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for amparo when the applicant fails to formally invoke the specific right to defense or legal protection required by the Constitution.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights right to defense procedural exhaustion constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 CE
consagrados en los arts. 17 y 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 147-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 147/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don Fernando Martí Lloret interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Castellón, condenatoria por delito de robo, y de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo confirmatoria en casación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en los arts. 17 y 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01087-1988_00147.pdf