Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1055/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1055A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of constitutional content.

Case Number AUTO 1055/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to prove the date of notification for the labor court judgment. The applicants argued that the proceedings violated their right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the claim lacked sufficient constitutional substance. Consequently, the procedural defect regarding notification timing and the absence of a clear constitutional violation led to the rejection of the remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the applicant fails to substantiate the date of notification and the claim lacks specific constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Appeal Right to Court Notification Date Procedural Defect Labor Dispute Substantive Merits Inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 259-1988

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 259/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María Teresa Martín de Benito y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Cáceres y Auto de aclaración, en procedimiento sobre reclamación de elecciones de representantes del personal. Invocan la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01055-1988_00259.pdf