Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1041/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1041A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 1041/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Spanish Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Ofelia Films against a labor court's refusal to annul procedural acts. The company argued that the oral trial suspension violated its right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the appeal lacked the necessary constitutional content. Consequently, the request was rejected because it did not sufficiently demonstrate a violation of fundamental rights as required by constitutional law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: An appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible if it lacks the constitutional content required to demonstrate a violation of fundamental rights or the right to effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional appeal admissibility lack of constitutional content oral trial suspension Article 24.1 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 77-1988

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 77/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: suspensión de juicio oral. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Ofelia Films, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 15 de Madrid que acuerdan no haber lugar a nulidad de actuaciones, en procedimiento sobre reclamación de cantidad. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01041-1988_00077.pdf