Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1030/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1030A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal interest regarding a pension value rescission case.

Case Number AUTO 1030/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Francisco Vaselca de Cara against a Supreme Court ruling on pension rescission. The appellant invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution, claiming a violation of effective judicial protection, but the Court found no concrete legal interest in the matter. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the underlying demand lacked the necessary constitutional content to justify the remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals where the underlying demand demonstrates no concrete legal interest or lacks the requisite constitutional content to constitute a valid claim for effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection legal interest requirement constitutional content of demand pension value rescission inadmissibility of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Manuel Díez de Velasco Vallejo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1711-1987

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.711/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Vaselca de Cara interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo que en casación revoca la de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 7 de Sevilla en autos sobre rescate del valor actual del subsidio de defunción.

Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01030-1987_01711.pdf