Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1024/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1024A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of constitutional content.

Case Number AUTO 1024/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Carroza Marcilla against a labor court judgment. The applicant requested a court-appointed lawyer to challenge the decision regarding commission claims, but the court found the notification date unproven and the claim lacked constitutional substance. Consequently, the procedural defect and absence of constitutional issues led to the rejection of the remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court rejects the appeal when the notification date is not substantiated and the petition fails to demonstrate a violation of constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility notification date substantiation lack of constitutional content court-appointed lawyer request labor commission claims

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1366-1987

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.366/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Víctor José Carroza Marcilla solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que confirma la de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 3 de Navarra

en autos sobre reclamación por comisiones.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01024-1987_01366.pdf