Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1022/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1022A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of equality claim regarding different unemployment benefit situations.

Case Number AUTO 1022/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Manzanos Bilbao against a labor court decision denying unemployment benefits. The applicant argued that the differential treatment of his case violated the principles of equality and legal protection under Articles 9.2 and 14 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the specific legal situation he faced warranted different treatment compared to others, thus lacking the necessary constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 9.2 and 14 of the Constitution; The Constitutional Court holds that a claim of inequality is inadmissible when the applicant fails to establish that the distinct legal situation treated differently lacks a reasonable justification or constitutes arbitrary discrimination.

Keywords

AI generated
principle of equality unemployment benefits constitutional appeal legal protection differential treatment lack of constitutional content inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 9.2 of the Constitution
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9.2 y 14 C.E.
Article 14 of the Constitution

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1038-1987

Fecha de resolución

26/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.038/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Recurso de amparo: alegación de inconstitucionalidad. Principio de igualdad: tratamiento diferenciado de situaciones normativas distintas. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don César Manzanos Bilbao solicita el nombramiento de Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 1 de Alava, confirmada en suplicación por el Tribunal Central de Trabajo,

desestimatoria de demanda sobre prestaciones por desempleo. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9.2 y 14 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers