Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1009/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1009A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to late invocation of Article 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution.

Case Number AUTO 1009/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Santiago Sánchez Blanco against a fraud conviction. The appellant argued that his rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution were violated, but the Court found the invocation of these rights to be untimely. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the formal requirement of timely invocation was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The right to judicial protection must be invoked within the statutory time limits, and late invocation results in the inadmissibility of the constitutional appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal late invocation judicial protection Article 24.1 procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 282-1988

Fecha de resolución

12/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 282/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: invocación tardía.

Don Santiago Sánchez Blanco interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 27 de Madrid, condenatoria por delito de estafa y de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial confirmatoria en apelación. Invoca vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las resoluciones impugnadas.

containers

Visualización

containers