Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 985/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:985A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to applicant's failure to file necessary legal documents.

Case Number AUTO 985/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to provide a lawyer and procurator for the public service. The applicant requested representation to challenge a lower court's refusal to archive case files, but did not submit the required legal documents. The court ruled that without proper representation, the effective constitutional protection of judicial rights could not be exercised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 54.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is not fulfilled when the applicant fails to provide the necessary legal representation required by law to exercise their constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection public service representation inadmissible appeal legal representation requirement constitutional rights exercise

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 54.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 757-1987

Fecha de resolución

12/09/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 757/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Imputabilidad directa de la violación a acción u omisión del órgano judicial: inactividad de la parte. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Pedro García Izquiano solicita se le provea de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Auto del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 11 de Barcelona que, en diligencias previas 1.686/82, no admitió el desarchivo

de las actuaciones.

containers

Visualización

containers