Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 977/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:977A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of ordinary court jurisdiction and sentence motivation.

Case Number AUTO 977/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of ordinary court jurisdiction and insufficient motivation in the lower court's decision. Vigilsa, S.A. argued that Articles 9, 14, 17, and 24.1 of the Constitution were violated regarding effective judicial protection and the right to a judge. The Court rejected these claims because the disputed issue fell under the exclusive competence of the ordinary judiciary and the lower court provided adequate reasoning.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 17 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction over matters exclusively within the competence of the ordinary judiciary, and an appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible if the contested decision is not subject to ordinary appellate review or lacks sufficient motivation.

Keywords

AI generated
ordinary court jurisdiction effective judicial protection sentence motivation constitutional appeal inadmissibility competence of ordinary courts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 17 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 912-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 912/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Derecho al Juez ordinario: cuestión de competencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Vigilsa, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Granada en apelación respecto de la dictada por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 7, en autos sobre reclamación de cantidad. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en los arts. 9, 14, 17 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00977-1988_00912.pdf