Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 970/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:970A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 14 and 24 CE.

Case Number AUTO 970/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a formal defect in the invocation of constitutional rights. The applicant, a prisoner, challenged the denial of conditional remission and an appeal, claiming violations of equality and judicial protection under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The court ruled that the applicant failed to formally identify the specific constitutional rights violated in the initial petition, rendering the appeal procedurally defective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the applicant fails to formally identify the specific constitutional rights they claim are violated in the initial petition.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement constitutional appeal admissibility Article 24 CE violation Article 14 CE violation procedural defect in appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 677-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 677/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Emilio Antonio Quesada Capín interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos del Juzgado de Instrucción de Cangas de Onís, denegatorio de los beneficios de remisión condicional de la pena por delito de quebrantamiento de condena, y de la Audiencia

Provincial denegatorio de la apelación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00970-1988_00677.pdf