Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 968/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:968A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of effective judicial protection due to failure to consign funds for appeal.

Case Number AUTO 968/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to consign the required funds for the labor appeal. The applicant argued that this procedural requirement violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without the financial consignation, the appeal could not be processed, rendering the constitutional complaint procedurally unviable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to constitutional appeals filed without the prior consignation of funds required for the underlying labor appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection labor appeal consignation constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural requirements Article 24.1 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 627-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 627/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: consignación previa en el recurso de casación laboral. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio López Sánchez interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 11 de Valencia, por las que se ordena, para recurrir contra Sentencia en autos sobre viudedad, consignar capital para las pretensiones fijadas, y

Auto de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo resolutorio de recurso de queja. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00968-1988_00627.pdf