Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to unreasoned denial of provisional liberty.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Julio Jiménez García against a denial of provisional liberty. The applicant argued that this decision violated his rights to equality, personal liberty, and effective judicial protection under Articles 14, 17, and 24 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the lower court's resolution lacked the required legal motivation, thereby failing to provide the effective judicial remedy guaranteed by the Constitution.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 17 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection requires that judicial resolutions be sufficiently motivated; a denial of provisional liberty is inadmissible if the reasoning is absent, as this prevents the applicant from understanding the grounds for the decision and challenging it effectively.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 328-1988
Fecha de resolución
21/07/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 328/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: denegación de libertad provisional. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de las resoluciones judiciales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Julio Jiménez García solicita la designación del Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Séptima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, que deniega solicitud de libertad provisional. Invoca la
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 17 y 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers