Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 941/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:941A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against civil judgment for lack of effective judicial protection due to procedural defects.

Case Number AUTO 941/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Jesús Iriarte Yoldi against a civil judgment for simple negligence. The applicant argued that the proceedings violated Article 24 of the Constitution by failing to provide effective judicial protection. The Court rejected this claim because the applicant's request for suspension of execution was procedurally defective and the underlying judgment did not constitute a violation of constitutional rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the applicant fails to meet procedural requirements for suspension of execution or if the challenged judgment does not demonstrate a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection suspension of execution procedural defects reformatio in peius Article 24 Constitution civil negligence judgment inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución del acto recurrido.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 880-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 880/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. «Reformatio in peius»: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jesús Iriarte Yoldi interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 3 de Madrid, condenatoria por falta de imprudencia simple, y del Juzgado de Instrucción resolutoria del recurso de apelación. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución del acto recurrido.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00941-1988_00880.pdf