Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 927/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:927A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and lack of effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 927/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the constitutional appeal inadmissible, citing the expiration of procedural time limits and the lack of effective judicial protection. Doña Emilia Tejero Urcola challenged a partial revocation of a labor court judgment regarding a widow's pension, alleging violations of equality and effective judicial protection. The court rejected the claim because the action had lapsed and the lower courts failed to address the specific constitutional issues raised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the action has expired due to procedural time limits or if the lower courts' omission does not constitute an incongruence preventing effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal effective judicial protection incongruence omission widow's pension procedural time limits labor court judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 206-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 206/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: incongruencia omisiva. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Emilia Tejero Urcola interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que en suplicación revoca parcialmente la de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 25 de Madrid, en autos sobre reclamación de pensión de viudedad. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00927-1988_00206.pdf