Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 925/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:925A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date causing procedural expiration of the action.

Case Number AUTO 925/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Hilario Gómez Casado against a Madrid court judgment. The appellant requested a court-appointed lawyer to file the appeal after the hearing occurred without prior notification. The court ruled that the lack of proven notification dates rendered the procedural action time-barred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a party fails to prove the date of notification required to initiate a constitutional appeal, resulting in the expiration of the statutory time limit.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration notification date constitutional appeal effective judicial protection time bar court appointed lawyer Madrid jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 89-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 89/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada; caducidad de la acción.

Don Hilario Gómez Casado solicita el nombramiento de Abogado del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del juzgado de Instrucción núm. 26 de Madrid, dictada en apelación, cuya vista se celebró sin previa notificación.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00925-1988_00089.pdf