Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 866/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:866A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to improper invocation of Article 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 866/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Luis Arrillaga Aldama against lower court rulings dismissing a false accusation case. The applicant invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution, arguing a violation of his right to judicial protection, but the court found the claim lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the formal invocation of the right was deemed untimely and the alleged violation did not meet constitutional standards.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of admissibility when the formal invocation of the right is untimely and the alleged violation lacks constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Appeal Article 24.1 CE Judicial Protection False Accusation Admissibility Requirements Procedural Impropriety Constitutional Content

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 523-1988

Fecha de resolución

04/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 523/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no oportuna. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Arrillaga Aldama interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 11 de Madrid, que acuerda archivo de diligencias previas incoadas por denuncia sobre falsedad, y de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial,

que desestima apelación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers