Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 857/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:857A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24.2 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 857/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights (recurso de amparo) filed by Don José Palomo Ontañón against civil judgments. The applicant formally invoked the right to a court and legal aid under Article 24.2 of the Constitution but failed to meet procedural requirements. The court ruled that without a proper formal invocation of the specific constitutional right violated, the appeal could not be admitted for examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 54.1 CE: The Constitutional Court will not admit an appeal for protection of rights unless the applicant formally invokes the specific constitutional right violated in the contested decision.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement Article 24.2 CE recurso de amparo inadmisión procedural prerequisites constitutional rights protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas.
Art. 54.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 258-1988

Fecha de resolución

04/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 258/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don José Palomo Ontañón interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Distrito de Aranda de Duero condenatoria por falta de daños y del Juzgado de Instrucción confirmatoria en apelación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en

el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers