Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of comparison for equality principle violation claim.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Serafín Zaragaza San Roque against a denial of military promotion. The appellant argued that the decision violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, but the court found no valid comparison between his situation and others. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the necessary elements to demonstrate a violation of equality were absent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 C.E.; The principle of equality requires a comparison between situations that are comparable; without such a comparison, a claim of unequal treatment cannot be substantiated.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 168-1988
Fecha de resolución
04/07/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 168/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Serafín Zaragaza San Roque interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Nacional, en recurso contra Resolución del Ministerio de Defensa denegatoria de ascenso al empleo militar inmediato
superior. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers