Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 799/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:799A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration of the action's filing deadline.

Case Number AUTO 799/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Rassin Zakarias regarding his request for a court-appointed lawyer. Zakarias sought representation to challenge rulings from the Madrid Provincial Court and the Supreme Court concerning eviction proceedings, but the court found the action expired. The decision rests on the strict procedural requirement that the appeal must be lodged within the statutory time limit, which had passed in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the action is not filed within the legally prescribed time limit, resulting in the loss of the right to judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal procedural expiration statutory time limit court-appointed lawyer eviction proceedings loss of right judicial protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 466-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 466/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Rassin Zakarias solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio, a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid por las que se declaró desierta la apelación

contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 10, en autos sobre resoluciones de arrendamiento, y contra Auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que desestima queja contra Auto de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid.

containers

Visualización

containers