Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 792/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:792A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of motivation in prior proceedings regarding insult charges.

Case Number AUTO 792/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the protection appeal filed by Mr. Giménez Lago against the dismissal of prior investigation steps. The appellant argued that Articles 24, 18, and 20 of the Constitution were violated due to the lack of motivation in the lower court's decision. The Court ruled that the absence of reasoning in the prior proceedings constituted a defect preventing the effective exercise of judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 18.1 CE; Art. 20.1 CE; Art. 4 CE: The lack of motivation in prior judicial resolutions constitutes a defect that precludes the effective exercise of the right to judicial protection under Article 24 of the Constitution.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of motivation judicial protection prior proceedings insult charges constitutional appeal effective remedy procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1, 18.1 y 20.1 y 4 C.E.
Art. 18.1 CE
Art. 20.1 CE
Art. 4 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 295-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 295/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de las resoluciones recurridas. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Luis Giménez Lago interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca que confirma el del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 3 que acordó el archivo de diligencias previas incoadas por querella por presunto delito de

injurias. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1, 18.1 y 20.1 y 4 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00792-1988_00295.pdf