Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 786/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:786A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for lack of judicial motivation and civil action reservation.

Case Number AUTO 786/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the amparo filed by Doña Visitación Pagador Rosario against a criminal conviction for simple negligence. The petitioner argued that the lower courts violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution by failing to adequately motivate their judgment and by reserving civil actions improperly. The Court rejected these claims, ruling that the existing procedural framework did not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 111.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not require a specific level of judicial motivation if the decision is legally sound, nor does it preclude the reservation of civil actions within the criminal procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
right to effective judicial protection judicial motivation requirement reservation of civil actions criminal negligence conviction constitutional amparo inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 111.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 236-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 236/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la resolución judicial; reserva de acciones civiles. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Visitación Pagador Rosario interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 27 de Madrid, que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 29, condenatoria por falta de imprudencia simple. Invoca la vulneración

del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00786-1988_00236.pdf