Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 770/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:770A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration of the right to file the appeal.

Case Number AUTO 770/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Pelegrín del Valle against criminal judgments. The petitioner requested the appointment of a public defender to file the appeal, arguing violations of rights to defense and legal certainty. The court rejected the request because the statutory time limit for filing the appeal had expired, rendering the action procedurally invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 25 C.E.: The right to judicial protection is subject to procedural time limits; failure to file the appeal within the prescribed period results in the loss of the right to judicial review.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration time limit lapse constitutional appeal right to defense public defender appointment judicial protection inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24 y 25 C.E.
Art. 25 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 134-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 134/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don José Pelegrín del Valle solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Huesca y Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, en causa

condenatoria por delito de falsedad y de estafa. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24 y 25 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las resoluciones recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers