Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 766/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:766A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding labor sanctions, ruling the right to presumption of innocence was not violated by administrative proceedings.

Case Number AUTO 766/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Torrico Muñoz against administrative sanctions for labor violations. The appellant argued that the proceedings violated his right to the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found no defect in the probative activity. Consequently, the court held that the constitutional demand lacked merit because the administrative process respected the required guarantees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The right to the presumption of innocence does not preclude the administrative authority from requiring the accused to justify their conduct during the sanctioning procedure, provided the burden of proof remains on the authority.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence labor sanctions administrative proceedings burden of proof constitutional appeal justification of conduct Article 24.2 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 63-1988

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 63/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: expediente sancionador; actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Torrico Muñoz interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Murcia, en recursos contra resoluciones de la Dirección General de Régimen Jurídico de la Seguridad Social

sobre sanciones por infracciones laborales. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00766-1988_00063.pdf