Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 758/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:758A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date, lack of formal rights invocation, and applicant's temerity.

Case Number AUTO 758/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by a real estate company against a court decision refusing to admit a criminal complaint. The applicant argued for a violation of equality rights but failed to prove the notification date, formally invoke the violated right, or demonstrate the content of the claim. The court rejected the appeal because the procedural defects and the applicant's temerity rendered the constitutional protection request unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the notification date is unproven, the right is not formally invoked, and the applicant's temerity is evident.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural notification defects formal rights invocation applicant temerity equality rights violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 24 of the Constitution
Article 25 of the Constitution

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1715-1987

Fecha de resolución

20/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.715/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia. Temeridad del recurrente: se aprecia.

«Planificaciones y Promociones Inmobiliarias, Sociedad Anónima», interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos del Pleno de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid por los que no se admite querella presentada contra un Consejero de la Caja de Ahorros de Madrid,

por presuntos delitos de prevaricación y de desobediencia. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el artículo 14 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00758-1987_01715.pdf