Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 740/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:740A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of content in the underlying labor judgment.

Case Number AUTO 740/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Doña Carmen Pereda Mendoza against a labor court dismissal judgment. The applicant invoked Article 24 of the Constitution, arguing for effective judicial protection, but the Court found the underlying sentence lacked the necessary legal content to support such a claim. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural defect lay in the initial judgment's failure to substantiate its reasoning, rendering the constitutional remedy inapplicable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal for protection of rights is inadmissible when the underlying judgment lacks the requisite legal content and reasoning to constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of legal content inadmissible appeal labor dismissal constitutional complaint procedural defect Article 24 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 528-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 528/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: declaración de incompetencia; fundamentación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Carmen Pereda Mendoza interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en suplicación de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 13 de Madrid, en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers