Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 728/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:728A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of comparison terms violating equality principle under Article 14.

Case Number AUTO 728/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Manuel Roldán Herreros against a labor court decision regarding overtime pay differences. The appellant argued that the ruling violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, but the court found no valid comparison terms existed in the case. Consequently, the court ruled that the claim lacked the necessary constitutional content to proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; The principle of equality requires a valid comparison term; a claim fails if no such term exists, rendering it devoid of constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
Principle of Equality Constitutional Appeal Lack of Comparison Term Article 14 CE Constitutional Content

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 266-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 266/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Manuel Roldán Herreros interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que en suplicación revoca la de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 12 de Madrid, en autos sobre reclamación por diferencia de horas extraordinarias.

Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers