Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 718/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:718A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of the right under Article 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 718/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Leopoldo de Miguel Celdrán against lower court rulings denying his hearing request. The applicant formally invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution but failed to substantiate the specific constitutional content of the alleged violation. The court ruled that without a clear demonstration of how the procedural denial violated the essence of the right to a court, the appeal could not proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 776 L.E.C.: The Constitutional Court requires a formal invocation of the right to a court coupled with a specific demonstration of its constitutional content; mere procedural denials without this substantive link result in inadmissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
right to a court formal invocation requirement constitutional content demonstration procedural denial inadmissibility standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 776 L.E.C.
12 de Madrid, denegatorias, de audiencia solicitada al amparo del art. 776 de la L.E.C.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 126-1988

Fecha de resolución

06/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 126/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Leopoldo de Miguel Celdrán interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 12 de Madrid, denegatorias, de audiencia solicitada al amparo del art. 776 de la L.E.C. y de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial

desestimatoria del recurso de queja, en autos de cognición. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers