Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 685/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:685A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of constitutional demand content despite valid presumption of innocence claim.

Case Number AUTO 685/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by a client seeking appointment to the free legal aid list. Although the client argued that the presumption of innocence was violated by the Audiencia Provincial's conviction, the court found the appeal lacked the necessary constitutional demand content required under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. Consequently, the request was rejected because the specific constitutional right invoked was not properly pleaded in the initial filing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 24.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for protection of rights when the specific constitutional right invoked lacks the requisite content or specificity in the demand, even if the underlying facts suggest a violation of the presumption of innocence.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional demand content presumption of innocence free legal aid appeal for protection of rights Article 24.2 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E.
la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1016-1987

Fecha de resolución

06/06/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.016/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no falta. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Javier Archiles Gonzáles solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial núm. 1, condenatoria por delito contra la salud pública. Invoca

la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00685-1987_01016.pdf