Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 668/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:668A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to insufficient court reasoning.

Case Number AUTO 668/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Maximiliano Castillo Berdeje against a criminal court's denial of a judicial investigation order. The applicants argued that the lower court violated their rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution by failing to provide adequate reasoning for its decision. The Court rejected the appeal because the contested resolution lacked the necessary motivation to constitute an effective judicial remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 2 CE: The right to effective judicial protection is violated when a judicial resolution is issued without the required motivation, thereby depriving the parties of the possibility to exercise their right of appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection judicial motivation requirement appeal rights violation constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of reasoning

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 CE
Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 483-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 483/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: informe pericial. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de las resoluciones judiciales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Maximiliano Castillo Berdeje y otro interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala de lo Criminal de la Audiencia Territorial de Zaragoza que desestima queja contra resolución del Juzgado de Instrucción de Calatayud denegatoria de diligencia de

prueba en diligencia de injurias. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers