Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 663/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:663A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and lack of constitutional content in the claim.

Case Number AUTO 663/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Carlos José Bello Díez against a criminal judgment confirming a sentence for lack of Article 586.3 of the Penal Code. The applicant invoked a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding the right to a court, but the court found the claim lacked constitutional substance and was time-barred. Consequently, the action was rejected because it failed to meet the procedural requirements for admissibility under the relevant constitutional framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if the claim lacks constitutional content or if the procedural deadlines for filing have expired, thereby preventing the court from examining the merits of the alleged rights violation.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural expiration lack of constitutional content right to a court criminal procedure timeline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.
Art. 586.3 Penal Code
Don Carlos José Bello Díez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de Bergara, que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito, por falta del art. 586.3.° del Código Penal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 349-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 349/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Carlos José Bello Díez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de Bergara, que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito, por falta del art. 586.3.° del Código Penal. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado

en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers