Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 645/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:645A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for hunting conviction due to applicant's reckless conduct and failure to invoke rights formally.

Case Number AUTO 645/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Ortega Ojeda against his conviction for hunting. The applicant formally invoked Articles 24.2 and 25.1 of the Constitution but failed to demonstrate a violation of the presumption of innocence regarding the evidentiary activity. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the applicant's conduct was deemed reckless and he did not meet the procedural requirements for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 25.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the applicant's conduct is reckless and they fail to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights violated.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court Appeal inadmissibility Presumption of innocence Hunting conviction Reckless conduct Procedural requirements Formal invocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E.
Art. 25.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 37-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 37/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Temeridad del recurrente: se aprecia. Costas: se imponen.

Don César Ortega Ojeda interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Instrucción de Arenas de San Pedro, condenatoria por delito de caza, y de la Audiencia Provincial de Avila, confirmatoria en apelación. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las resoluciones impugnadas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00645-1988_00037.pdf