Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 633/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:633A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration and failure to formally invoke rights.

Case Number AUTO 633/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline had expired and the applicant failed to formally invoke the violated right. Don Ramón Martínez Collado challenged lower court decisions regarding a complaint against a judge, claiming a violation of Article 24 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim, ruling that the action was time-barred and the necessary formal invocation of the right was absent.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 40.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction when the appeal is time-barred or the right is not formally invoked.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration formal invocation constitutional appeal time bar Article 24 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 40.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1750-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.750/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don Ramón Martínez Collado interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid que inadmitió querella contra un Juez, y Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que inadmitió recurso de casación contra

el anterior. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00633-1987_01750.pdf