Constitutional court dismisses appeal against Supreme Court's rejection of complaint for coercion under Art. 24.1 CE.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Alvarez Sastre against the Supreme Court's rejection of a complaint alleging coercion. The appellant argued that the Supreme Court violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution by dismissing the initial complaint. The court ruled that the lower court's decision did not infringe constitutional rights, as the complaint lacked the necessary content to constitute a valid constitutional violation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal against a lower court's dismissal of a complaint when the complaint fails to demonstrate a genuine violation of the right to effective judicial protection.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1657-1987
Fecha de resolución
23/05/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.657/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de querella. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Ricardo Alvarez Sastre y otra interponen recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo por los que se inadmite querella promovida contra el Presidente de la Audiencia Provincial de Castellón, por presunto delito de
coacciones. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers