Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 600/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:600A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and failure to formally invoke the right.

Case Number AUTO 600/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadline for filing had expired and the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional right violated. The petitioner sought a public defender to challenge a labor dismissal judgment but did not meet the strict temporal requirements or articulate the constitutional grievance with necessary precision. Consequently, the court rejected the request, emphasizing that procedural bars and formal invocation deficiencies preclude constitutional review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 44 CE: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the action has expired due to the lapse of the prescribed time limit or if the applicant fails to formally and specifically invoke the constitutional right alleged to be violated.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal formal invocation time limit lapse public defender appointment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 44 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1089-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.089/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María del Carmen Fontecha e Higes solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo frente a la Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo confirmatoria de la de la Magistratura de

Trabajo núm. 5 de Madrid en autos sobre despido.

containers

Visualización

containers