Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 597/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:597A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of content and insufficient evidence of innocence violation.

Case Number AUTO 597/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal against a traffic safety conviction, citing a lack of substantive content in the claim. The petitioner argued that the trial violated his right to a presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found no sufficient evidence of such a violation. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the demand failed to meet the required constitutional standards for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a demand for an appeal to demonstrate a clear violation of the right to a presumption of innocence through specific procedural defects, rejecting appeals lacking sufficient content or evidence of such violation.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence right to defense traffic safety crime constitutional appeal admissibility lack of content procedural violation judicial review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 596-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 596/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jacobo Viguera Galán interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid confirmatoria de la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 22 que condenó por delito contra la seguridad del tráfico. Invoca la vulneración

de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers