Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 559/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:559A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for mortgage loan arbitration award under Art. 24 CE.

Case Number AUTO 559/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the amparo resource filed by Inmobiliaria Salónica S.A. against a Supreme Court judgment confirming an arbitration award regarding mortgage loan costs. The company argued that the Supreme Court's decision violated its right to a court under Article 24 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim because the arbitration award itself was not challenged, and the Supreme Court merely confirmed it without altering the legal basis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The right to a court does not extend to challenging the confirmation of an arbitration award by a higher court when the original arbitral decision remains unimpugned.

Keywords

AI generated
right to a court arbitration award confirmation Supreme Court cassation constitutional amparo inadmissibility mortgage loan arbitration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 12-1988

Fecha de resolución

09/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 12/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Inmobiliaria Salónica. S. A.» , interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que en casación confirma laudo arbitral, sobre determinación de gastos e intereses en préstamo hipotecario y otros extremos. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el artículo 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers