Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 557/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:557A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of constitutional content in the underlying civil judgment.

Case Number AUTO 557/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by tenants against a civil court judgment. The applicants argued that the lower court's decision violated their right to a court and legal certainty under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim because the contested judgment lacked the necessary constitutional content to be reviewed by this body.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court does not examine civil judgments that lack constitutional content or fail to provide effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal lack of constitutional content effective judicial protection right to court civil judgment review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1-1988

Fecha de resolución

09/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectivas de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Miguel Canal Codina y otra interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Santa Coloma de Farners en apelación de la dictada por el de Distrito de Blanes, en autos de juicio verbal sobre declaración

arrendaticia. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers