Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 552/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:552A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal claiming pension denial violated equality and due process rights.

Case Number AUTO 552/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Picazo Berruga against a Supreme Court ruling denying his retirement pension. He argued that the decision violated his rights to equality under Article 14 and due process under Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court rejected these claims, finding no sufficient content in the demand to establish a constitutional violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals where the demand fails to substantiate a constitutional violation.

Keywords

AI generated
recurso de amparo principio de igualdad derecho a la defensa carencia de contenido Tribunal Constitucional

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1746-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.746/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: ilegalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Picazo Berruga interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo confirmada en revisión, por la que se desestimó reclamación sobre pensión de retiro. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en

los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00552-1987_01746.pdf