Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 549/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:549A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 24.2 and 25.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 549/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by workers convicted of a labor-related crime against the Supreme Court's judgment. The applicants formally invoked Articles 24.2 and 25.1 of the Constitution, claiming violations of their right to defense and protection of work. The Court rejected the appeal because the formal requirements for invoking these specific constitutional rights were not met in the procedural record.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2; Art. 25.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court admits an appeal for protection only when the formal invocation of the violated constitutional rights is explicitly and correctly made in the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights right to defense protection of work inadmissible appeal procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E.
Art. 25.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1702-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.702/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don José María Valdovinos Buil y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, que desestimó recurso de casación y contra las Sentencias dictadas por la Audiencia Provincial de Huesca, confirmadas por la

anterior y que condenan a los actores por un delito contra la libertad y seguridad en el trabajo. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00549-1987_01702.pdf