Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 530/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:530A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of formal invocation of rights and ineffective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 530/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for failing to formally invoke the specific rights claimed. The applicant sought free legal aid to challenge a Supreme Court judgment regarding civil liability, but the court found the demand lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the remedy was rejected because the formal requirements for effective judicial protection were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1987: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the applicant fails to formally invoke the specific rights violated or when the challenged judgment does not require constitutional review.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights effective judicial protection constitutional content of demand free legal aid admissibility of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1987

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1330-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.330/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida; apelación adhesiva. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Elisa Michanet Lara solicita el beneficio de justicia gratuita y la designación de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo dictada en casación contra la promovida por la

Sala de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Valencia, en autos de mayor cuantía del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 5 de Valencia.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00530-1987_01330.pdf