Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 497/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:497A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to direct judicial responsibility for conviction and lack of constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 497/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution was directly attributable to the judicial organs' actions. The applicants, convicted of robbery, argued for a suspension of execution based on procedural defects in the trial. The court rejected this, ruling that the judiciary cannot be held liable for its own judgments and that the appeal lacked sufficient constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The violation of the right to a court cannot be imputed to the judicial organs when they are the direct authors of the decision, and an appeal must contain specific constitutional arguments to be admissible.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial responsibility direct attribution right to court constitutional demand inadmissible appeal procedural defect suspension of execution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia impugnada.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 135-1988

Fecha de resolución

25/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 135/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Imputabilidad directa de la violación a acción u omisión del órgano judicial: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Mateo Martínez Valero y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Badajoz que, en apelación, confirma la del Juzgado de Instrucción de Almendralejo, condenatoria por delito de robo. Invocan la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia impugnada.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00497-1988_00135.pdf