Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 478/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:478A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against rape conviction, stating judicial fact-finding is not subject to constitutional review.

Case Number AUTO 478/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by a convicted rape victim seeking free legal aid and a public defender. The applicant argued that the final conviction violated Article 24 of the Constitution, but the Court held that the assessment of evidence and facts belongs exclusively to the ordinary judiciary. Consequently, the court ruled that constitutional review cannot challenge the factual determinations made by lower courts in criminal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 10.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to reviewing the factual findings or evidence evaluation of ordinary courts in criminal judgments.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility judicial fact-finding review Article 24 constitutional protection rape conviction finality ordinary court authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E
Art. 10.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 961-1987

Fecha de resolución

25/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 961/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su valoración corresponde al Juez. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Ignacio Tinahones Martínez solicita el beneficio de justicia gratuita y la designación de Procurador del turno de oficio, a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba, confirmada

por la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, condenatoria por delitos de violación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E

containers

Visualización

containers