Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 463/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:463A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal challengeability.

Case Number AUTO 463/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Felipe Avila Moreno and others against eviction judgments. The applicants argued that the lower court sentences violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution by lacking legal challengeability. The court rejected this claim because the contested decisions were not subject to legal challenge, thereby failing the admissibility requirement for the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a judicial decision lacks legal challengeability, as the absence of a legal remedy precludes the constitutional appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection legal challengeability constitutional appeal admissibility eviction proceedings lack of remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 211-1988

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 211/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión: Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Felipe Avila Moreno y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado Primera Instancia núm. 1 de Cáceres, en autos de interdicto de retener la posesión, y de la Audiencia Provincial confirmatoria en apelación. Invocan la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers