Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 461/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:461A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to procedural exhaustion failure.

Case Number AUTO 461/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Andrés Galera Huertas against administrative and supreme court rulings. The petitioner argued that his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution was violated regarding planning norm modifications. The court rejected this claim because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that all available judicial remedies had been properly exhausted before seeking constitutional relief.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine constitutional complaints if the applicant has not exhausted the ordinary judicial remedies provided by law.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal inadmissibility administrative planning norms procedural prerequisites

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 184-1988

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 184/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Andrés Galera Huertas interpone recurso de amparo contra Acuerdos del Ayuntamiento de Campo de Criptana, sobre modificación de normas subsidiarias de planeamiento, y contra Sentencias de las Salas de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Albacete y de la

Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo desestimatorias. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers