Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 451/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:451A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of formal invocation of rights and absence of fundamental rights violation.

Case Number AUTO 451/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to the applicant's failure to formally invoke the specific right allegedly violated. The applicant, convicted of reckless negligence, claimed a breach of Article 24 of the Constitution but provided no evidence that the denial of proof constituted a fundamental rights violation. The court ruled that without a formal invocation and a demonstrated infringement of constitutional guarantees, the appeal could not proceed to substantive review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a formal invocation of the specific right violated and proof that the procedural outcome constitutes a fundamental rights infringement to admit a constitutional appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal admissibility formal invocation of rights fundamental rights violation procedural denial of proof Article 24 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1691-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.691/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Julio Escudero Martínez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Cuenca que confirma la del Juzgado de Instrucción de Motilla del Palancar, condenatoria por delito de imprudencia temeraria. Invoca la vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers