Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 450/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:450A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of procedural standing regarding the right to a fair trial.

Case Number AUTO 450/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicants lacked the necessary procedural standing to challenge the conviction. The applicants, convicted of a public health offense, argued that their trial violated their right to a fair trial under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim, ruling that the applicants could not invoke the right to a fair trial as a ground for inadmissibility in this specific procedural context.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The right to a fair trial does not grant standing to challenge a final conviction when the applicant has not exhausted the ordinary judicial remedies or lacks the requisite procedural interest to file the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
right to fair trial procedural standing exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal final conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1680-1987

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.680/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Varela García y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencias de la Audiencia Provincial de Bilbao, condenatoria por delito contra la salud pública, y de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, que la confirma en casación. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00450-1987_01680.pdf